Visible-light-induced C–N bond formation by Ce(III)-containing antimonotungstate with Ce-to-polyanion charge transfer

Yufeng Liu a, Hanjin Shia, Miao Zhangc, Haoqi Liua, Pengtao Ma*c and Guoping Yang*ab
aJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Functional Organic Polymers, Jiangxi Key Laboratory for Mass Spectrometry and Instrumentation, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China. E-mail: erick@ecut.edu.cn
bHubei Key Laboratory of Processing and Application of Catalytic Materials, Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang, Hubei 438000, China
cHenan Key Laboratory of Polyoxometalate Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan 475004, China. E-mail: mpt@henu.edu.cn

Received 18th July 2025 , Accepted 8th August 2025

First published on 12th August 2025


Abstract

The direct transformation of C–H to C–N bonds is a significant conversion for organic synthesis, pharmaceutical, and fine-chemical industries. It is imperative to explore economical and environmentally friendly catalytic systems that focus on reusable catalysts, waste reduction, and mild conditions. Herein, we present an efficient and eco-friendly method for promoting the direct conversion of C–H to C–N bonds in water under visible light irradiation using a Ce(III)-containing antimonotungstate photocatalyst, [(CH3)2NH2]4Na21{[Ce4(H2O)8W6O12(tar)3(OAc)][B-α-SbW9O33]4}·51H2O (CeSbW, H4tar = tartaric acid, HOAc = acetic acid). CeSbW exhibits excellent photoelectric activity with a unique intramolecular charge transfer from CeIII to POM (WVI) upon visible light irradiation. With CeSbW as the photocatalyst, the visible-light-induced C–N bond formation via hydroacylation of dialkyl azodicarboxylates was successfully achieved, featuring broad substrate scope, excellent reusability, and environmentally benign reaction conditions. This methodology not only enriches the synthesis strategies for visible-light-responsive POM catalysts but also provides an efficient and sustainable photocatalytic system for C–N bond construction.


Introduction

The construction of C–N bonds represents one of the most pivotal reactions in organic synthesis, extensively utilized in the synthesis of natural products, pharmaceuticals, functional materials, and so on.1–6 A wide variety of methodologies have been developed to construct C–N bonds; however, one reaction that has garnered renewed attention after being overlooked is the formation of acyl hydrazides from azodicarboxylates and aldehydes.7 The reaction employs readily available aldehydes as starting materials, and the resulting hydrazides are widely applied in the synthesis of high-value-added chemicals, such as the drugs vorinostat and moclobemide.8,9 Therefore, significant efforts have been dedicated to advancing the hydroacylation of azodicarboxylates with aldehydes as an efficient route for C–N bond formation. Traditional strategies for synthesizing acyl hydrazides typically involve transition metal catalysis, alongside the use of strong acids or bases and high temperatures.10–13 Achieving hydroacylation of azodicarboxylates under green and mild conditions remains both interesting and challenging. Photocatalysis, owing to its potential to utilize sunlight as a clean and renewable light source, has emerged as an environmentally benign and sustainable approach for organic transformations.14–17 The photocatalyzed hydroacylation of azodicarboxylates through C–H bond activation of aldehydes is recognized as a mild and efficient method for C–N bond formation. A series of photocatalysts, including tetrabutylammonium decatungstate, graphite flakes, and benzoylformic acid, have been utilized to realize this transformation.18–23 Despite the notable advantages of these catalytic systems, challenges such as the poor durability of photocatalysts and the use of toxic solvents continue to drive the development of new photocatalytic systems that better align with the principles of green and sustainable chemistry.

Polyoxometalates (POMs) are a class of structurally well-defined metal oxide clusters that exhibit superior thermal and oxidative stability compared to organic or organometallic complexes.24–28 Moreover, POMs possess unique photoinduced charge-transfer and redox properties due to intramolecular ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT).29,30 However, the current LMCT process requires ultraviolet light irradiation because of the substantial energy gaps involved, thereby limiting the widespread application of POMs in photocatalysis.31–33 Visible-light-responsive POMs can be achieved by regulating the HOMO and/or LUMO of POMs through the introduction of metal cations into the vacant sites.34–36 Trivalent lanthanide (Ln) cations, owing to their high coordination number and flexible coordination environment, can flexibly connect lacunary POMs to construct novel Ln-containing POMs (Ln-POMs).37–41 Some Ln-POMs have demonstrated prominent metal-to-POM charge transfer, enabling visible-light-induced chemical transformations.42,43 For example, Streb et al. utilized visible-light-responsive [(Ce(DMSO)4)2V11O30Cl] as a catalyst for the photocatalytic oxidative degradation of organic dye molecules.44 The Mizuno group synthesized a visible-light-responsive Ce-POM: TBA6[{Ce(H2O)}2{Ce(CH3CN)}24-O)(γ-SiW10O36)2], which exhibits good photocatalytic activity for the visible-light-promoted oxidative coupling of benzylamine, selective oxidation of thioethers, and α-cyanation of tertiary amines.45 Given the pivotal role of C–N bond formation in organic synthesis, there is an urgent need to develop visible-light-responsive POM catalysts for efficient C–N bond construction.

Herein, we successfully synthesized a Ce-containing antimonotungstate, [(CH3)2NH2]4Na21{[Ce4(H2O)8W6O12(tar)3(OAc)][B-α-SbW9O33]4}·51H2O (CeSbW), via a one-step method from an acetate buffer solution at room temperature. CeSbW consists of four [B-α-SbW9O33]9− units linked through a unique central [Ce4(H2O)8W6O12(tar)3(OAc)]11+ cluster core modified by two carboxylate groups. This structure represents a rare POM integrated with mixed organic carboxylate ligands. CeSbW exhibits a significant response to visible light due to the presence of prominent intramolecular CeIII-to-polyanion (WVI) charge transfer. Upon irradiation with visible light, CeSbW exhibits excellent catalytic performance for the conversion of C–H to C–N bonds by hydroacylation of dialkyl azodicarboxylates. The hydroacylation product could be obtained in up to 99% yield with broad substrate scope in an environmentally friendly manner.

Results and discussion

Crystal structure description of CeSbW

CeSbW crystallized in the triclinic space group P[1 with combining macron] (Table S1). CeSbW consists of the organic–inorganic hybrid tetrameric anion {[Ce4(H2O)8W6O12(tar)3(OAc)][B-α-SbW9O33]4}25− (Fig. 1a and b), twenty-one Na+ cations, four [(CH3)2NH2]+ cations, and about fifty-one lattice water molecules. The bond-valence sum (BVS) calculations for CeSbW indicate that the oxidation states of the Sb, W, and Ce centers are +3, +6, and +3, respectively (Table S2). In CeSbW, two {SbW9} units are linked together by one asymmetric [Ce2(H2O)4W3O6]12+ {Ce2W3} segment to construct the half-polyanion {[Ce2(H2O)4W3O6][SbW9O33]2}6− (Fig. 1c). The dimeric half-polyanion presents an open C-shaped sandwich structure, providing an ideal cavity for the pentacore {Ce2W3} fragment. Vacancies in each three-vacancy {SbW9} unit are occupied by one W atom and one Ce atom via two W–O–W bonds and two Ce–O–W bonds. Two such {CeW(SbW9)} units are connected by a third W (W11 or W32) atom, which occupies the remaining vacant oxygen position, thereby forming a dimer (Fig. 1d and e). There are two types of crystallographically independent Ce3+ ions in 1a; one type (Ce1 and Ce3) is coordinated by three μ2-O atoms from three centrally bridged {WO6} octahedra, in addition to two terminal O atoms from {SbW9}. The other type (Ce2 and Ce4) is similarly coordinated to the two terminal oxygen atoms from {SbW9}, but in addition, each ion is simultaneously bound to the three centrally bridged {WO6} octahedra by three μ2-O atoms and three coordinated water ligands. In the {Ce2W3} cluster, the three {WO6} octahedra are isolated from each other and do not interact, while the two Ce centers are positioned on opposite sides of a triangle formed by three W atoms. This configuration results in the formation of a triangular bipyramidal structure composed of these five atoms (Fig. 1f).
image file: d5qi01526j-f1.tif
Fig. 1 (a) Molecular structure of CeSbW. (b) Simplified model of CeSbW. (c and d) Structure of the {[Ce2(H2O)4W3O6][SbW9O33]2}6− dimeric unit built by two {SbW9} linkers and one {Ce2W3} linker. (e) Connection between two {SbW9} and centric {Ce2W3} connectors. (f) The {Ce2W3} cluster has a triangular bipyramidal structure. (g) [Ce4(H2O)8W6O12(tar)3(OAc)]11+ fragment. (h) {Ce2(H2O)2W2O2(tar)2(OAc)}5+ fragment. (i) {Ce2(H2O)6W4O10(tar)}6+ fragment.

In the structural unit of the polyanion CeSbW, there are four crystallographically unique Ce3+ ions. The coordination numbers and geometries of Ce1/Ce3 and Ce2/Ce4 are nearly identical. The Ce1 and Ce3 ions are nine-coordination monocapped tetragonal antiprisms (Fig. S1), coordinated by three carboxyl oxygen atoms from the tartrate and acetate ligands, and two μ2-O atoms from the three {SbW9} units, two μ2-O atoms from three {WO2} groups, and one water molecule. The Ce2 and Ce4 ions exhibit an eight-coordinated dodecahedral configuration (Fig. S1), coordinated by two μ2-O atoms from the three {SbW9} units, two μ2-O atoms from three {WO2} groups, and three water molecules.

Alternatively, CeSbW can be described as a rectangular tetramer, consisting of the decanuclear Ce–W bimetallic fragment [Ce4(H2O)8W6O12(tar)3(OAc)]11+ {Ce4W6(tar)3(OAc)} (Fig. 1g) and four {SbW9} fragments. The two pentanuclear {Ce2W3} fragments are connected by tartrate and acetate ligands to form the {Ce4W6(tar)3(OAc)} fragment. Specifically, the {Ce4W6(tar)3(OAc)} fragment consists of two subunits: a {Ce2(H2O)2W2O2(tar)2(OAc)}5+ {Ce2W2(tar)2(OAc)} fragment (Fig. 1h) and a {Ce2(H2O)6W4O10(tar)}6+ {Ce2W4(tar)} fragment (Fig. 1i). In {Ce2W2(tar)2(OAc)}, the W and Ce atoms (W22 and Ce1 or W1 and Ce3) are bridged by the tartrate ligand. Two oxygen atoms from the carboxyl and hydroxyl groups on the tartrate ligand coordinate with the W22 or W1 atoms. The Ce1 and Ce3 atoms are linked together by two oxygen atoms on the acetate ligand. In {Ce2W4(tar)}, two {Ce(H2O)3W2O5} fragments are connected by a tartrate ligand, with four oxygen atoms from the tartrate ligand coordinated to the W21 and W42 atoms, respectively. Additionally, the free CeSbW units are arranged regularly along the a, b, and c axes in the –AAA– motif (Fig. S2). Notably, in the bc plane, CeSbW units in the same column are parallel, while units in adjacent columns are arranged in an interleaving fashion.

Photophysical properties

First, we tested the photoelectric properties of CeSbW to evaluate its feasibility in photocatalysis. To prepare samples for optical property testing, the Cs salt of CeSbW with poor water solubility (recorded as CeSbW-Cs) was synthesized by reacting CeSbW with CsCl in water. FT-IR spectra indicated that the polyanion structure remained unchanged (Fig. S4). Solid-state UV-vis testing showed that CeSbW-Cs had a wide light absorption range between 200 and 500 nm, indicating its effective utilization of visible light during photocatalysis (Fig. 2a). The optical band gap (Eg) of CeSbW-Cs was determined to be about 2.70 eV using the Kubelka–Munk function and Tauc plot (Fig. 2a inset). Mott–Schottky experiments at 1500, 2000, and 2500 Hz were conducted to calculate the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of CeSbW-Cs. As shown in Fig. 2b, the LUMO position of CeSbW-Cs is estimated to be −1.35 V vs. Ag/AgCl (−1.15 V vs. NHE). The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) position is 1.44 V vs. NHE according to EHOMO = Eg + ELUMO (Fig. 2b inset). As shown in Fig. 2c, the transient photocurrent measurements of CeSbW-Cs exhibited a fast and periodic response during five consecutive rounds of intermittent irradiation. In addition, the electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS) of CeSbW-Cs was recorded, and a semicircular plot was obtained (Fig. S7). These results indicate efficient spatial separation and migration of photogenerated charge carriers in CeSbW-Cs. In conclusion, the photoelectric performance tests suggested that CeSbW-Cs has great potential to be an excellent photocatalyst.
image file: d5qi01526j-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of CeSbW-Cs; (b) Mott–Schottky spectra of CeSbW-Cs; (c) photocurrent response curves of CeSbW-Cs.

Photocatalyzed C–N bond formation

The observed excellent optical and electrochemical properties of CeSbW encouraged us to investigate its potential as a photocatalyst for the conversion of C–H to C–N bonds via hydroacylation of dialkyl azodicarboxylates. Initially, a series of solvents, including EtOH, dimethyl carbonate (DMC), ethyl acetate (EA), propylene carbonate (PC), H2O, and MeCN, were screened using benzaldehyde (1a) and di-tert-butyl azodicarboxylate (2a) as substrates (Table 1, entries 1–6). The results revealed that H2O was the optimized solvent, affording the product 3a with 75% yield. To further enhance this hydroacylation reaction, various light sources were examined with H2O as the solvent (Table 1, entries 7–10). The results suggested that a 420 nm LED was the optimal light source and achieved a yield of 99% (turnover number [TON] = 247.5, turnover frequency [TOF] = 82.5 h−1) (Table 1, entry 7). This TOF value was the highest among all reported photocatalysts (Table S3). Additionally, lower yields were observed when decreasing the amount of 1a or shortening the reaction time, respectively (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). The optimized reaction conditions were established as follows: 1a (0.6 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), and CeSbW (0.4 mol%) were stirred at room temperature for 3 h under the irradiation of a 420 nm LED (10 W) in H2O (2 mL). Moreover, the CeSbW-Cs prepared from CeSbW also exhibited good catalytic performance under identical conditions, indicating that the counter-cations had a negligible effect on catalytic activity (Table 1, entry 13).
Table 1 Screening of the reaction conditionsa

image file: d5qi01526j-u1.tif

Entry Light source Solvent Yieldb (%)
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.6 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), and CeSbW (0.4 mol%) in solvent (2 mL) at room temperature under the irradiation of a 10 W LED and an N2 atmosphere for 3 h.b Isolated yields.c 1a (0.4 mmol).d Reaction time: 2 h.e CeSbW-Cs instead of CeSbW.
1 465 nm EtOH 25
2 465 nm DMC 53
3 465 nm EA 46
4 465 nm PC 60
5 465 nm H2O 75
6 465 nm MeCN 38
7 420 nm H2O 99
8 390 nm H2O 90
9 365 nm H2O 84
10 White LED H2O 59
11c 420 nm H2O 77
12d 420 nm H2O 80
13e 420 nm H2O 93


The substrate scope of various aldehydes and azodicarboxylates was examined under optimal reaction conditions to demonstrate the broad applicability of the CeSbW-based photocatalytic system (Table 2). First, benzaldehydes bearing electron-donating groups (–Me, –iPr, and –OMe) reacted smoothly with 2a to generate the corresponding products 3a–3e in good yields (80–99% yields). The reaction also proceeded efficiently with a series of halo-substituted benzaldehydes (–F, –Cl, –Br), affording the desired products 3f–3i in high yields (84–93%). Notably, even strongly electron-withdrawing groups such as –CN, –CF3, and –COOMe were also compatible with this photocatalytic system, producing the hydroacylation products 3j–3l in good yields (80–88%). In addition, naphthaldehydes and N-heterocycle aldehydes served as effective substrates, resulting in the formation of the desired products 3m–3o in excellent yields. Furthermore, diethyl azodicarboxylate and diisopropyl azodicarboxylate exhibited similar reactivity to 2a, achieving yields of 96% and 98%, respectively (3p and 3q).

Table 2 Substrate scope of the hydroacylation reactiona
a Reaction conditions: benzaldehyde 1 (0.6 mmol), o-azodicarboxylate 2 (0.2 mmol), and CeSbW (0.4 mol%) in H2O (2 mL) at room temperature under the irradiation of a 10 W LED and an N2 atmosphere for 3 h.
image file: d5qi01526j-u2.tif


H2O, as a reaction solvent, is not only environmentally benign but also facilitates the separation of products from the reaction mixture, thereby enhancing the feasibility of recycling the CeSbW catalyst. Following the reaction, organic compounds can be readily separated from the aqueous phase by simple extraction with organic solvents, while the aqueous phase containing dissolved CeSbW can be reused for subsequent runs. As shown in Fig. 3a, CeSbW in the aqueous phase was successfully recycled five times without significant deactivation using 1a and 2a as model substrates. The UV-vis absorption spectra before and after catalysis show no obvious changes (Fig. 3b), indicating the excellent reusability and photostability of CeSbW.


image file: d5qi01526j-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (a) Cycling experiments; (b) UV-vis absorption spectra of CeSbW before and after catalysis; (c) control experiments; (d) UV-vis spectra of the aqueous solution containing benzaldehyde and CeSbW under visible light (420 nm) for 0–3 h under an N2 atmosphere; (e) UV-vis spectra of photoreduced CeSbW before (—, in an aqueous solution containing benzaldehyde and CeSbW with visible light (420 nm) irradiation for 3 h under an N2 atmosphere) and after (---) adding 2a for 2 min; (f) possible catalytic mechanism.

A series of control experiments were conducted to investigate the reaction mechanism. As shown in Fig. 3c, CeCl3·6H2O exhibited some catalytic activity, albeit lower than that observed for a mixture of Na9[SbW9O33]·19.5H2O ({SbW9}) and CeCl3·6H2O. This indicates a possible charge transfer between the CeIII centers and the lacunary {SbW9} ions in solution. The high catalytic efficiency of CeSbW indicates that the crystal framework facilitates the charge transfer from Ce to POMs, enhancing its catalytic activity. When radical inhibitors 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl-oxidanyl (TEMPO) and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) were introduced into the reaction system, the reaction was significantly inhibited, suggesting that this catalytic process may involve radical intermediates. Moreover, the corresponding adduct 4 was detected by high-resolution mass spectrometry, which further indicated that the benzoyl radical was generated in this transformation (Fig. S8). To further investigate the charge transfer from Ce to the polyanion, UV-vis spectroscopy experiments were performed. Upon visible light irradiation (420 nm) of an aqueous solution containing benzaldehyde and CeSbW under a nitrogen atmosphere, the solution color changed from pale yellow to purple, suggesting the possible formation of WV species (Fig. 3d inset). The intensity of the band around 820 nm, attributed to the intervalence charge transfer from WV to WVI, gradually increased under visible light irradiation (Fig. 3d), providing additional evidence for the formation of WV species. Moreover, when 2a was added to the photoreduced system, the WV species was rapidly reoxidized within 2 min in the absence of light, with the UV-vis spectrum closely resembling that of the original CeSbW (Fig. 3e). These results indicate that visible-light-induced charge transfer occurs from CeIII to the polyanion (WVI) in CeSbW, with 1a participating in the formation of WV species and 2a facilitating the reoxidation process.

Based on the experimental results and relevant literature,20,22,45 a plausible mechanism for the CeSbW-catalyzed hydroacylation reaction was proposed (Fig. 3f). Under light irradiation, CeIIISbWVI undergoes intramolecular charge transfer to form an excited state [CeIVSbWV], which subsequently reacts with benzaldehyde 1a via hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) to generate benzoyl radicals A and H+[CeIIISbWV]. The radical addition of A to the N[double bond, length as m-dash]N bond of 2a generates the nitrogen radical B. B abstracts the hydrogen proton from H+[CeIIISbWV] and is subsequently reduced by [CeIIISbWV], leading to the formation of the desired product along with the regeneration of the photocatalyst.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we successfully synthesized a visible-light-responsive Ce(III)-modified antimonotungstate through a one-pot assembly reaction. The compound exhibits unique intramolecular CeIII-to-polyanion (WVI) charge transfer under visible light irradiation, which enables CeSbW to show good visible light absorption and good photoelectric properties. These features endow CeSbW with excellent photocatalytic activity for the visible-light-induced conversion of C–H to C–N bonds. This catalytic reaction proceeds under mild conditions in water with broad substrate scope of aldehydes. The photocatalyst shows good stability and reusability. This work provides guidance for the development of new visible-light-responsive POM catalysts for valuable chemical transformations.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the SI. SI including materials and instrumentation, synthetic and experimental procedures, characterisation data, details of X-ray crystallographic analysis, and NMR spectra. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5qi01526j.

CCDC 2428624 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper.46

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22371040 and 22301033), the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20232ACB213005 and 20242BAB25125), and the Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Processing and Application of Catalytic Materials (202441804).

References

  1. J. Goh, S. K. Ong, Y. S. Tan and T.-P. Loh, Catalyst-free C–N bond formation under biocompatible reaction conditions, Green Chem., 2022, 24, 3321–3325 RSC .
  2. Q.-L. Hu, Y.-F. Liu, X.-L. Lin, Z.-F. Lin, J.-W. Cao and G.-P. Yang, Two different three-dimensional uranium-containing polymolybdates based on Zn(II) for the heterogeneous catalytic construction of C–N bond, Inorg. Chem., 2024, 63, 8919–8924 CrossRef PubMed .
  3. M. Ju and J. M. Schomaker, Nitrene transfer catalysts for enantioselective C–N bond formation, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2021, 5, 580–594 CrossRef PubMed .
  4. M. D. Kärkäs, Electrochemical strategies for C–H functionalization and C–N bond formation, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 5786–5865 RSC .
  5. F. C. Raps, A. Rivas-Souchet, C. M. Jones and T. K. Hyster, Emergence of a distinct mechanism of C–N bond formation in photoenzymes, Nature, 2024, 637, 362–368 CrossRef PubMed .
  6. H. Song, D. A. Chipoco Haro, P.-W. Huang, L. Barrera and M. C. Hatzell, Progress in photochemical and electrochemical C–N bond formation for urea synthesis, Acc. Chem. Res., 2023, 56, 2944–2953 CrossRef PubMed .
  7. A. Shamsabadi and V. Chudasama, An overview of the synthesis of acyl hydrazides from aldehydes and reactions of the products thereof, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2017, 15, 17–33 RSC .
  8. G. N. Papadopoulos and C. G. Kokotos, Photoorganocatalytic one-pot synthesis of hydroxamic acids from aldehydes, Chem. – Eur. J., 2016, 22, 6964–6967 CrossRef .
  9. G. N. Papadopoulos and C. G. Kokotos, One-pot amide bond formation from aldehydes and amines via a photoorganocatalytic activation of aldehydes, J. Org. Chem., 2016, 81, 7023–7028 Search PubMed .
  10. V. Chudasama, J. M. Ahern, D. V. Dhokia, R. J. Fitzmaurice and S. Caddick, Functionalisation of aldehydesvia aerobic hydroacylation of azodicarboxylates ‘on’ water, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 3269–3271 Search PubMed .
  11. D. Lee and R. D. Otte, Transition-metal-catalyzed aldehydic C−H activation by azodicarboxylates, J. Org. Chem., 2004, 69, 3569–3571 CrossRef PubMed .
  12. B. Ni, Q. Zhang, S. Garre and A. D. Headley, Ionic liquid (IL) as an effective medium for the highly efficient hydroacylation reaction of aldehydes with azodicarboxylates, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2009, 351, 875–880 CrossRef .
  13. J. M. Pérez and D. J. Ramón, Cobalt-impregnated magnetite as general heterogeneous catalyst for the hydroacylation reaction of azodicarboxylates, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2014, 356, 3039–3047 CrossRef .
  14. D. Cambié, C. Bottecchia, N. J. W. Straathof, V. Hessel and T. Noël, Applications of continuous-flow photochemistry in organic synthesis, material science, and water treatment, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 10276–10341 CrossRef PubMed .
  15. L. Marzo, S. K. Pagire, O. Reiser and B. König, Visible-light photocatalysis: does it make a difference in organic synthesis?, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 10034–10072 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  16. T. Noël and E. Zysman-Colman, The promise and pitfalls of photocatalysis for organic synthesis, Chem Catal., 2022, 2, 468–476 Search PubMed .
  17. F. Strieth-Kalthoff, M. J. James, M. Teders, L. Pitzer and F. Glorius, Energy transfer catalysis mediated by visible light: principles, applications, directions, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 7190–7202 RSC .
  18. G. S. Koutoulogenis, M. G. Kokotou, E. Voutyritsa, D. Limnios and C. G. Kokotos, Visible-light-mediated catalytic hydroacylation of dialkyl azodicarboxylates by graphite flakes, Org. Lett., 2017, 19, 1760–1763 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  19. G. N. Papadopoulos, D. Limnios and C. G. Kokotos, Photoorganocatalytic hydroacylation of dialkyl azodicarboxylates by utilising activated ketones as photocatalysts, Chem. – Eur. J., 2014, 20, 13811–13814 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  20. I. Ryu, A. Tani, T. Fukuyama, D. Ravelli, S. Montanaro and M. Fagnoni, Efficient C–H/C–N and C–H/C–CO–N conversion via decatungstate-photoinduced alkylation of diisopropyl azodicarboxylate, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 2554–2557 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  21. N. A. Stini, E. T. Poursaitidis, N. F. Nikitas, M. Kartsinis, N. Spiliopoulou, P. Ananida-Dasenaki and C. G. Kokotos, Light-accelerated “on-water” hydroacylation of dialkyl azodicarboxylates, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2023, 21, 1284–1293 RSC .
  22. P. Xie, S. Shi, X. Hu, C. Xue and D. Du, Sunlight photocatalytic synthesis of aryl hydrazides by decatungstate-promoted acylation under room temperature, ChemistrySelect, 2021, 6, 3922–3925 CrossRef CAS .
  23. L. Chen, K.-X. Tan, Z.-J. Zheng, X.-L. Lin, B.-M. Ming, Z.-B. Zhang and G.-P. Yang, Uranyl-organic framework as hydrogen atom transfer catalyst for visible-light-driven heterogeneous hydroacylation of azodicarboxylates, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2024, e202400001 CAS .
  24. G. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Chen, Y. Shi, M. Zhang, G. Shen, P. Qi, J. Li, D. Ma, F. Yu and X. Huang, Indirect electrocatalysis S–N/S–S bond construction by robust polyoxometalate based foams, Adv. Mater., 2023, 35, 2304716 CrossRef CAS .
  25. Y. Feng, M. Zhao, J. Yang, Z. Wang, P. Bai, Y. Liu, H. Lv and G. Yang, Wearing gigantic silver armor on transition-metal-containing polyoxometalates: formation of supertetrahedral intercluster compounds, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202505511 CrossRef CAS .
  26. Z. Zhao, J. Wei, Z. Lang, M. Chi, X. Liu, J. Yang, G. Yang and H. Lv, A superatomic {Ag8}6+ cluster induced by asymmetric mixed-addendum polyoxometalate, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2025, 147, 25107–25114 CrossRef CAS .
  27. S.-R. Li, W.-D. Liu, L.-S. Long, L.-S. Zheng and X.-J. Kong, Recent advances in polyoxometalate-based lanthanide–oxo clusters, Polyoxometalates, 2023, 2, 9140022 CrossRef .
  28. M. Chi, J. Wei, Z. Zhao, X. Liu, W. Sun and Y. Feng, Lv and G. Yang, Structural isomerism of {Ag14}10+ nanocluster encapsulated by bowl-like polyoxometalates, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2025, 64, e202424499 CrossRef CAS .
  29. T. Yamase, Photo- and electrochromism of polyoxometalates and related materials, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 307–326 CrossRef CAS .
  30. X. Huang, S. Liu, G. Liu, Y. Tao, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Li, H. Wang, Z. Zhou, G. Shen, Z. Xue and D. Sun, An unprecedented 2-fold interpenetrated lvt open framework built from Zn6 ring seamed trivacant polyoxotungstates used for photocatalytic synthesis of pyridine derivatives, Appl. Catal., B, 2023, 323, 122134–122144 CrossRef CAS .
  31. M. Chi, Y. Zeng, Z. Lang, H. Li, X. Xin, Y. Dong, F. Fu, G. Yang and H. Lv, Molecular orbital engineering of mixed-addenda polyoxometalates boosts light-driven hydrogen evolution activity, ACS Catal., 2024, 14, 5006–5015 CrossRef CAS .
  32. Y. Feng, F. Fu, L. Zeng, M. Zhao, X. Xin, J. Liang, M. Zhou, X. Fang, H. Lv and G. Yang, Atomically precise silver clusters stabilized by lacunary polyoxometalates with photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2024, 63, e202317341 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  33. D. M. Schultz, F. Lévesque, D. A. DiRocco, M. Reibarkh, Y. Ji, L. A. Joyce, J. F. Dropinski, H. Sheng, B. D. Sherry and I. W. Davies, Oxyfunctionalization of the Remote C−H Bonds of Aliphatic Amines by Decatungstate Photocatalysis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 15274–15278 CrossRef CAS .
  34. F. Gao, W. Xiao, S. Li and B. Yu, A polyniobotungstate-based hybrid for visible-light-induced phosphorylation of N-Aryl-tetrahydroisoquinoline, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2022, 14, 19278–19284 CrossRef CAS .
  35. Y. Ma, F. Gao, W. Xiao, N. Li, S. Li, B. Yu and X. Chen, Two transition-metal-modified Nb/W mixed-addendum polyoxometalates for visible-light-mediated aerobic benzylic C–H oxidations, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2022, 33, 4395–4399 CrossRef CAS .
  36. K. Suzuki, N. Mizuno and K. Yamaguchi, Polyoxometalate photocatalysis for liquid-phase selective organic functional group transformations, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 10809–10825 CrossRef CAS .
  37. C. Boskovic, Rare earth polyoxometalates, Acc. Chem. Res., 2017, 50, 2205–2214 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  38. Z.-F. Lin, G.-P. Yang, W.-J. Jiang, J.-C. Chen and Y.-F. Liu, The Assembly of Cerium(III)-containing silicotungstate with Lewis acid–base sites enables the selective C3-alkenylation of oxindole, Inorg. Chem., 2024, 63, 19390–19395 CrossRef CAS .
  39. G. Yang, Z. Lin, X. Zhang, J. Cao, X. Chen, Y. Liu, X. Lin and K. Li, Assembly of Y(III)-containing antimonotungstates induced by malic acid with catalytic activity for the synthesis of imidazoles, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2024, 35, 110274 CrossRef CAS .
  40. G. Yang, H. Liu, J. Chen, X. Lin, K. Tan, Y. Dong, Y. Liu and Y. Wei, Dy/Ho-encapsulated tartaric acid-functionalized tungstoantimonates: heterogeneous catalysts for isoindolinone synthesis, Chem. Commun., 2024, 60, 10934–10937 RSC .
  41. G. Yang, J. Cao, Z. Lin, S. Li, Y. Dong and Y. Liu, Praseodymium–selenium connecting selenotungstate containing mixed building blocks for catalytic synthesis of aza-heterocycles, Inorg. Chem. Front., 2025, 12, 1831–1838 RSC .
  42. K. Suzuki, F. Tang, Y. Kikukawa, K. Yamaguchi and N. Mizuno, Hydrogen evolution using the visible-light-induced metal-to-polyoxometalate multiple electron transfer, Chem. Lett., 2014, 43, 1429–1431 CrossRef CAS .
  43. T. Takashima, A. Yamaguchi, K. Hashimoto and R. Nakamura, Multielectron-transfer reactions at single Cu(II) centers embedded in polyoxotungstates driven by photo-induced metal-to-metal charge transfer from anchored Ce(III) to framework W(VI), Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 2964–2966 RSC .
  44. A. Seliverstov and C. Streb, Chirality meets visible-light photocatalysis in a molecular cerium vanadium oxide cluster, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 1827–1829 RSC .
  45. K. Suzuki, F. Tang, Y. Kikukawa, K. Yamaguchi and N. Mizuno, Visible-light-induced photoredox catalysis with a tetracerium-containing silicotungstate, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5356–5360 CrossRef PubMed .
  46. Y. F. Liu, H. J. Shi, M. Zhang, H. Q. Liu, P. T. Ma and G. P. Yang, CCDC 2428624 (CeSbW): Experimental Crystal Structure Determination, 2025,  DOI:10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2mj5q2 .

Footnote

These authors contributed equally to this work.

This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2025
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.